Alexander Myths #5 – Feeling Is The Truth

“Seeing is believing”

You’ve probably heard that old chestnut, but have you heard the other half of it?

“Seeing’s believing, but feeling’s the truth”

Old Thomas Fuller(°) got it right. People do believe their feelings, at least when it comes to movement. Let me transport you to a typical Alexander Technique lesson.

The student is doing an activity – let’s say sitting in a chair. He (or she) is clearly doing something while they sit that takes a vast amount of muscle effort – let’s say pushing back against the back of the chair. However, they are blissfully unaware of it. If I ask what they notice, they don’t know they are doing it.

More importantly, if I tell them, THEY DON’T BELIEVE ME. They feel like they are sitting lightly and easily, and for them, the feeling is the truth(^).

“If I was doing that, I would know about it.”
“There’s no way I could do that and not feel it.”
“I can’t be doing that. I would feel it.”

FM Alexander encountered this myth(˜) in himself, much to his dismay. Looking in a mirror he saw that “I did not put my head forward and up as I intended, but actually put it back. Here, then, was startling proof that I was doing the opposite of what I believed I was doing and of what I had decided I ought to do.” (*)

How do I convince these students? If they can sense how they change when I do hands-on work that might do the trick. Sometimes feedback from the rest of the group is enough, or taking a photo to show them. Sometimes I never do convince them. The myth is too strong.

 

(°) From Gnomologia (1732), via Wikiquote; written in the 18th century by Thomas Fuller. It turned out to be tailor-made for this blog (thank you, Thomas).
(^) I’m not making these quotes up. They are real quotes from real lessons.
(˜) If you are curious about the first four myths, check them out here:-
Myths #1 http://goo.gl/h51VAx
Myths #2 http://goo.gl/xcbr3s
Myths #3 http://goo.gl/NqbDo9
Myths #4 https://goo.gl/1VfbLE
(*) FM Alexander, ‘Use of the Self’ p.417, IRDEAT edition

Image by Kadres via pixabay

Advertisements
Tagged with: , ,
Posted in activity, feeling, myths

How To Choose the Best Activity For Alexander Class

In my lessons the student chooses the activity we look at. Some people love having a choice. Others find it causes great heartache. Here’s my 10-point plan to de-stress the choosing process:-

1. Bear in mind why you choose; if it’s relevant to you, you will pay more attention. Simple. Pick something that is relevant in your life.

2. If the something is not likely to happen again for another year or so, or even “never again”, then the lesson might not prove quite so useful.

3. You are allowed to choose things you have done before. In fact, it’s usually a good idea.

4. Quite a lot of things you cannot physically do in class, like swimming or cycling, can still be worked on usefully, with a little creativity.

5. Don’t neglect the perfectly ordinary things you do. Brushing hair. Scrubbing saucepans. Locking doors. Sending texts. Students tend to dismiss these as lesson activities, because they never think of them in daily life. That’s precisely the reason TO have a lesson on them. So that you DO think of them in daily life.

6. It doesn’t have to be a problem to get a good lesson out of it. If you’ve run out of problems, what is it you would like to improve?

7. Nothing is too small, trivial or mundane to make a good lesson out of.

8. Nothing is too large or complicated to make a good lesson out of.

9. Don’t wait until you get to class to think about it. Keep asking yourself during the week, ‘Would this thing I’m doing now be good to work on in my lesson?’ and if the answer is yes, write it down somewhere so you don’t forget it.

10. Is there something you shouldn’t choose for lessons? Yes. Anything you don’t care about and aren’t prepared to follow through with afterwards.

Image courtesy of Clker-Free-Vector-Images via pixabay.com

Tagged with: ,
Posted in activity, tips

Teacher Malfunction

Let’s start the blogging year off with a juicy, controversial question:

Would you take lessons from a teacher you knew occasionally made mistakes?

Tricky one, isn’t it(*).  Especially because, although the Alexander Technique is strictly speaking a form of education, in terms of description, regulation and marketing it’s normally considered an alternative therapy.  Sort of medical.  How many of us are comfortable with the idea that the person teaching/treating us sometimes fails, has setbacks, makes mistakes?

A few boundaries might be helpful here. I am not talking about catastrophic, life-threatening failure. Unlike, say, brain surgery, it’s actually quite difficult to make that sort of mistake in the Alexander Technique.  Neither am I talking about consistent ineptitude.  I’m talking about occasional, small, mundane mistakes.

But even on this very mundane scale, would you be happy if, in a lesson, your teacher said “no, I got that bit wrong, let’s try this instead”?  Wouldn’t it be better if the teacher blagged their way through, or said nothing and carefully hid their failing?

For me the answer is loud and clear.  No.  It would not be better and here’s why. If a teacher covers up their mistakes, they are very clearly sending the student the message that mistakes and failures in Alexander lessons ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.

Uh oh.

Bad enough in ordinary life. But in a discipline that is based on experimenting and learning from the results of those experiments, positive or negative, that’s pretty disastrous.

What if, in lessons, the teacher modelled the process of making a mistake, analysing it calmly and objectively and learning something constructive from the experience? Consistently and repeatedly.

Might that not, over time, start to change how you react when you fail in your own Alexander process? And maybe even to change how you react when you fail in everyday life?

To me that sounds like a very valuable skill to learn.

(*) My inspiration for this question came from reading this:-
http://www.pickthebrain.com/blog/failing-does-not-necessarily-mean-failure/

Image courtesy of jesadaphorn at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

Tagged with: ,
Posted in asking questions, comfortable, experiment

The Alexander Technique Christmas Quiz

Today is the last class before Christmas. Time to review the year and to start planning new courses for January. Meanwhile, some lightheartedness for my students and colleagues – the Ashby Alexander Technique Christmas Quiz, as requested by my advanced group students for their last class of the year.  Best done while scoffing vast amounts of mince pie and brandy butter.

I wish you all a peaceful, healthy and happy 2018.

1. What is end-gaining?

a. Winning at all costs
b. Setting your satnav before you leave
c. Going directly for your ends without paying attention to how you achieve them

2. What is FM’s alternative to end-gaining?

a. Getting your partner to read the map
b. Means-whereby
c. Means-therein

3. What is most memorable about FM’s grandfather?

a. He was a champion sheep-breeder
b. He was governor general of Melbourne
c. He was deported to Tasmania for criminal offences

4. When did FM first come to England?

a. 1904
b. 1908
c. 1914

5. Who was the first teacher to receive a teaching certificate from FM, and who later worked extensively with AR Alexander, became Don Weed’s trainer and so became the heritage of the ITM way of teaching?

a. Marjorie Barstow
b. Marjory Barlow
c. Thelma Barlow

6. What, according to Don Weed, is the poise of the head in relation to the body in movement the key to?

a. A sore neck
b. A better posture
c. Freedom and ease of motion

7. What is the next step after (1) analyze the conditions present and (2) select the appropriate means you have reasoned out whereby you can gain your end?

a. Project consciously the directions required
b. Project consciously the directions required to gain your end
c. Project consciously the directions required for putting these means into effect

8. What is proprioception?

a. Awareness of where the different parts of your body are
b. An early method of contraception
c. End-gaining using psychic abilities

9. Why doesn’t the ITM teach ‘head forward and up’?

a. No-one can agree exactly what it means
b. It tends to lead a student to ‘do’ something to achieve it
c. Good students keep on going further and further up, even when they pass the normal resting position of the spine and head

10. How many moving vertebrae in the human spine?

a. 14
b. 18
c. 24

11. What did FM insist his students do before he would agree to teach them?

a. Read one of his books
b. Pay him a retainer
c. Recruit another student

12. What is ‘Man’s Supreme Inheritance’?

a. The ability to move like Neanderthal Man
b. Complete control of our own potentialities
c. Freedom from pain

13. How, in his fourth book, does FM define the ‘Universal Constant in Living’?

a. The influence of the manner of use upon the general functioning of the organism in every reaction and during every moment of life
b. Death and taxes
c. In the mind of man lies the secret of his ability to resist, to conquer and finally to govern the circumstance of his life

14. Some Alexander schools link the occipital muscles with the Primary Control. Where are these muscles?

a. In your bottom
b. At the back of the head, where the skull joins the spine
c. At the base of the neck

15. How does Don Weed quantify the real power of the ‘poise of the head’ concept in this work?

a. The successful employment of one’s organism is accomplished through the acquisition of poise and a reasoned control of one’s own physical being
b. If you can learn how to discipline your thinking so that you can take advantage of this simple physiologic fact – easily, consistently, and at will – you will have learned a mental discipline that you can apply to every part of your life including the designing of your life and the reaching of your dreams
c. By following a process of genuine trust in the reasoning process you are employing, you may go into activity in pursuit of the goals you have chosen, knowing you have done everything possible to ensure success

16. What is the point of the Monkey Trap story?

a. Monkeys love nuts
b. Using indirect procedures
c. The need to consider conditions present

17. When did FM die?

a. 1945
b. 1955
c. 1965

18. What completes Dr Don’s Well-Madeness Chart? “Which is more likely true: that we are poorly-made and have to do something to perform well, or…”

a. “that we are well-made and have to do something to perform poorly?”
b. “that we need Alexander Technique lessons in order to perform well?”
c. “that we are poorly-made and we may as well give up now?”

19. Fill in the gap: “The aim is to bring about at all times and for all purposes not a series of correct …, but a co-ordinated use of the mechanisms in general”

a. attitudes and opinions
b. prescribed exercises
c. positions or postures

20. Same or different?

a. Same
b. Different
c. Don’t know

Graphic created by Starline – Freepik.com

Answers
1c   2b   3c   4a   5a   6c   7c   8a   9 all of them   10c
11a   12b   13a   14b   15b   16b   17b   18a   19c   20 all of them

Tagged with: ,
Posted in quiz

Stairs, Fatigue and The Monster

Going up and down stairs is difficult for a lot of people.  I see it in Alexander Technique lessons.  I also see people make it even harder for themselves.

A recent lesson turned up a beautiful example. This student has an illness which makes fatigue a huge issue in her life, on levels most people couldn’t comprehend (having said this, it applies equally well to any number of different medical conditions). She chose stairs for her lesson activity, and I asked her to try them out, so we could see what was going on.

Let’s be clear, there is a certain amount of exertion needed to walk up a flight of stairs, quite a lot more than walking on flat ground. No use pretending you can float up without any effort whatsoever. And if you have one of these medical problems, stairs might always be difficult.

BUT

 

Before this student had even got out of the chair, she had hunched her neck, scrunched her shoulders and bunched her legs. By the time she reached the bottom of the stairs she looked like she was carrying the weight of the world. All that hunching, scrunching and bunching can only be achieved by one thing – muscles working hard. Which means that she had added in loads of extra, unnecessary effort to her movements. She made herself more tired before she even set foot on the first step.

Did she intend to do all this? No.
Did she realize she was doing it? No, at least not before the lesson.

But in her mind stairs had become a bigger and bigger problem, which resulted in her creating more and more extraneous muscle tension, which in turn made it harder and harder to walk up the stairs, which made her dread the stairs even more. She had created a monster.

So we spent a while investigating what was real, and what was something extra she was creating. By the end of the lesson, we’d shrunk the monster to something more like this:-

And when we tried stairs again a few lessons later, she was unrecognisable. No more monster.

Graphic by OpenClipart-Vectors via Pixabay

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in activity, change, effort, physical limits

Alexander Technique Myths #4: If I don’t know what I’m doing, I can’t stop it.

It’s time for another Alexander Technique myth (I have a collection*). A hotly debated myth, it goes like this:-

“I can’t stop it if I don’t know what I’m doing.”

It also appears as “I have to know what I’m tensing in order to let it go”; while the wording varies, the intent is the same.

To pull apart this particular myth, I would like to recount one of my group classes:-

Student 1 is working on bringing her arms behind her back. We chat about it, I do some hands on.
STUDENT 1: “I’m holding on with this shoulder, aren’t I?”
At this point she stops holding on, without any help from me.  Her arm moves much further and more easily.

Then comes the next student.
STUDENT 2: “I want to look at stooping, I find myself stooping all the time. I know I’m doing it
and I can’t stop.”
Hmmm. If it were true that once you knew what you are doing you could stop it, then Student 2 would not have come with his story.

Student 3, does walking. We work a while, I do some hands-on and she walks some more.
KAREN: “Same or different, class?”
SOMEONE IN THE CLASS: “Her arms are moving less” (murmurs of general agreement from the
group)
STUDENT 3: “I didn’t know I was moving my arms!”
She didn’t know she was doing it. She didn’t know she had stopped doing it. But to everyone else in the group that was a clear outcome of the process of Alexander thinking. What does that do to the assumption that you can’t stop it if you don’t know what it is?

I’m not saying there is no correlation between knowing and stopping. As student 1 proved, knowing can be a powerful tool in the process, but as student 3 proved, it certainly is not essential. Don’t let yourself be limited in this way. ‘Knowing’ is a variable creature, so approach with caution.

(*) Myths #1 http://goo.gl/h51VAx
Myths #2 http://goo.gl/xcbr3s
Myths #3 http://goo.gl/NqbDo9

Image courtesy of Becker1999 via http://www.flickr.com

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in feeling, myths, stopping

How to Learn the Alexander Technique? Contrast and Hone.

My blog today has a culinary theme, or at least a culinary metaphor. It should be pretty clear from my other blogs that the Alexander Technique is all about learning. But people tend to have very rigid ideas about what learning means. Usually, it’s being told a fact and memorising it. Or maybe being shown the right way to do something, and then doing it that way.

Both are good learning techniques, but very limited. I don’t want to be restricted that much, and I don’t want my students to be restricted either.

So, where to look for other models of learning? Well, how about the world of brewers, vintners and olive oil producers? (that was what you were thinking, wasn’t it??) It seems that(*):

“Brewers and vintners learn by exposure, gradually honing their focus and deepening their awareness. By sniffing and contrasting batches and ingredients, they learn to speak a language of flavour…

Proficiency builds with exposure and practice. (Though not quickly; the average training period for a sensory panellist is sixty hours)…

The people who work with olives and olive oil, most of whom performed supernaturally well on the ranking… tests, were occasionally stumped by some of the most common and, to me, obvious aromas… Those aren’t important flavours in the day-to-day of the olive world, so there’s no reason for her to know them.”

Key ingredients of this recipe (sorry, taking a metaphor a bit too far there):-

• Gradually honing and deepening
• Focus
• Contrasting
• Learning to speak a new language of expertise
• Making something new and unusual increasingly important in your day-to-day world.

Have a guess where else you might find these same ingredients. Ok, not sniffing, and regretfully no alcohol. But the other elements are all there in the Alexander Technique. Focusing on movement, actions and activities. Contrasting the different decisions you make, and the results of those decisions. Honing your thinking by repeating tiny steps many times. Making this process increasingly important in your day-to-day world.

(*) All quotes are from “Gulp, Adventures on the Alimentary Canal” by Mary Roach, pages 17 and 24. It’s a fascinating book if you’re not squeamish.
Photo by Supermariolxpt via http://www.flickr.com

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Alexander thinking, everyday life, improvement, learning

What Sort of Alexander Technique Student Are You?

I want to tell you a story about The Sheepish Student and The Industrious Student.

Once upon a time there were two students. The first student came to her lesson every week, and when the teacher asked her how she was getting on, she would give a sheepish smile and say, “I’m sorry, I’ve been that busy I’ve not had a chance to think about it.”  She did this week after week after week.  She and the teacher enjoyed the lessons enormously.

The second student would go home after her lesson and work industriously at what she had learnt. She thought about the ideas, she talked about them with her friends, she read the homework, she tried out the ideas in the things she did every day.  She did this week after week after week.  She and the teacher enjoyed the lessons enormously.

How quickly did our two students learn the Alexander Technique?

The first one: Really Slowly.

The second one: Really Fast.

Old-fashioned morality tales aside, what was the difference?   My colleague Nicola Dobiecka sums up very nicely(*) three major components for learning this work:-

  • We are prepared to change.
  • We’re prepared to learn how to stop doing things the way we’ve done them in the past.
  • We are prepared to take the time needed to do this.

Take another look at no. 3: We are prepared to take the time needed to do this.

It’s not an easy thing to ask. You’re working long hours, you have loads of commitments, your home life is busy. However, if you want this to work it means more than just turning up once a week to lesson.  Like my industrious student, you need to find the time to think, to experiment, to ponder.   Each think, each experiment, each ponder doesn’t take long, no more than a few moments.

But it does require you to step back from your usual whirl of busyness.

(*) http://www.reasontochange.co.uk/what-is-the-alexander-technique/the-alexander-technique-is-not-a-quick-fix/

Image courtesy of ulleo via Pixabay.com

 

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in Alexander thinking, change, everyday life, progress

Even More Alexander Technique Freebies

Last time I talked about the voucher system of Alexander freebies, and collecting odd moments to practice.  Today, some more freebies.

Our starting question is ‘What do you learn from?’  Not “what do people in general learn from?” but “What do you learn from?”

It’s a very relevant question if you are taking Alexander Technique lessons.  If you are going to be successful, you have to learn.  No getting away from it.  Obviously, you learn from your Alexander Technique teacher, but that costs money.  So where are these other free sources?

There are loads of them. Heaps.  Once you start looking a little more widely, you’ll be tripping over them.  The next best after your teacher, is the other students in your Alexander group,  if you have group classes.  Then there are blogs, podcasts and video tutorials by the hundred.  All of them specifically geared to learning, in varying degrees of formality.

But what about all the learning that sneaks up in disguise? The lady you sit next to in the waiting room who is tatting, and more than happy to talk about it.   Standing in the queue listening to the couple behind you talk about the 10-mile walk they did in the Peak District.  A novel set in Gorbachev-era Moscow.

One small example, just one. The other day I was trying to find out how to make sauerkraut, and I came across this video(*) by Sandor Katz.  Great video, clear, well explained, informative.  But just watch what he does with his upper body every time he wants to emphasize a word.  You don’t need many Alexander lessons to realise this is a recipe for a lots of extra work, and probably sore muscles, as well as good sauerkraut.  Was I expecting a culinary Alexander lesson, an impromtu reminder of what is and is not necessary for verbal emphasis?  No.  But I got one, a good one, for nothing.

(*) http://thehealthyeatingsite.com/how-to-make-sauerkraut/
Photo by wendybkoon via pixabay.com

Tagged with: , ,
Posted in asking questions, everyday life, learning, tips

Alexander Technique Freebies

Let’s face it, Alexander Technique lessons are a high quality product, and they don’t come cheap. So wouldn’t it be nice if there were a few freebies thrown in as well?  Students often bring this up, indirectly. “How many lessons does it take to learn this?” they say, which is usually a very polite way of asking “How much is it going to cost me?”

Usually I talk about the need to practice what you have covered in lessons. To think through the ideas, to experiment with doing things differently, to challenge your old assumptions.  As often as possible.  The more you do this, the fewer lessons it takes.  However, it’s hard to make lots of time for this sort of practice.  You’re a busy person.

So why not collect freebies? You don’t need a whole afternoon sat on an isolated mountain top.  Your life is full of spare moments to step back and do some Alexander thinking.  Brief, but valuable.

While you are cleaning your teeth.
While you are waiting for the kettle to boil.
While you are sitting at traffic lights.
While the adverts are on tv.
While you are waiting for someone to answer their phone.
While you are walking to the bathroom.
While you are sitting on the bus or the tube.
While you are in the supermarket checkout queue.

Clearly, these are freebies you find for yourself. No teacher has yet managed to project a ghostly voice into your kitchen, or ghostly hands into the supermarket (I’m not sure you would want them to).  Think of it more as a kind of voucher system, where you have to present and claim the vouchers for yourself on the spot.

“Is your kettle slow to boil?” “Present your Alexander Voucher now!”
“Long walk to the bathroom?” “Present your Alexander Voucher now!”
“No-one answering the phone?” “Present your Alexander Voucher now!”

If you counted up all these moments you would find you had a considerable chunk of extra Alexander in your week. How much more does it cost?  Nothing.

Photo by Freepik.com

Tagged with: , , ,
Posted in everyday life, progress, tips
%d bloggers like this: